Review of OpenOffice as it compares to Microsoft Office
In
reviewing OpenOffice as it compares to Microsoft Office, the first main point I
need to make is that I was confused as to what OpenOffice was! I thought it was
the free, available to students Microsoft Office accessed online. I now know
that OpenOffice is an entirely different software modeled on Microsoft Office.
I will focus on Writer vs. Word and Presentation vs. Powerpoint, as those are
the applications I am most familiar with in Microsoft Office.
In Writer, the user has all
the basic functions of Word immediately available. It seemed a little bit like
stepping back in time to much earlier versions of Word. All the necessary
functions of the program are there, but in a less advanced presentation. The
latest versions of Word include options that do not exist in Writer. There are features to share and engage
through social media that I was unable to locate in Writer. There is an option to dictate under the Home
toolbar. Also, a lightning bolt option offers ideas to the user such as ways to
improve your writing. Also, there are emoji options not available in the
proprietary version.
In Presentation, it too
was like stepping back in time to an early version of Powerpoint. All the
necessary functions are there to create slide presentations, but the user is
lacking the more advanced options in Powerpoint. There are interesting new
backgrounds, formatting, and other options currently available in Powerpoint.
It too, like Word, offers sharing, social media, and emoji graphics options not
available in Presentation.
Review of digiKam as it compares to iPhoto
DigiKam is an open source,
free program to manage and edit photos. It has extensive options to create many
effects and manipulations of photos. It has all the storage and sharing options
of iPhoto. I was impressed with the many ways it could search and categorize
photos: by date, by person, by place, by time, and many more. DigiKam offers many
more options than iPhoto offers such as a light table for more advanced photo
editing. Aperture was the more advanced MacOS photo editor, but it is no longer
supported. iPhoto offers a library organized by events, photos, faces, and
places only. It has basic editing and sharing across social media options. If a
photographer wants to do more with their photos, digiKam offers much more than
the basics of iPhoto.
Review of Firefox as it compares with
Microsoft Edge
Firefox is a browser that
can be used as an open source and free alternative to Microsoft Edge (the
replacement for Internet Explorer). Firefox offers many ways to organize your
homepage as well as new security elements. The landing page offers three new
options at the top: sync, Monitor, and mobile. Signing into sync will allow you
to take your settings with you on any device. A mobile site facilitates the use
of the browser with your options on your mobile device. Firefox Monitor
searches for data breaches. Also on the main page, Firefox offers its Top Sites
that you’ve visited as well as Pocket, a curator of stories for you
individually that strives to maintain user privacy and control. Popular topics
are also available.
Microsoft Edge is
Microsoft’s proprietary answer to the new options offered by web browsers such
as Firefox. It too offers new security elements. It also seeks to curate
stories for the individual user. Its main page continues with stories as far as
the user keeps scrolling. When accessing tips to understand the browser’s new
elements, it seeks to convey its purpose which is to “Stay Productive; Stay
Organized; Stay Safe.” Each of the three categories have new elements such as
form fill, decluttered printing, highlighting, saving, clipping, as well as a
Hub for bookmarking and creating a reading list. It seems that Microsoft wanted
to include elements from e-reader devices such as Kindle as well as safety
protections emphasized by Firefox.
Microsoft Edge does offer
many desirable elements to a customized browser homepage. But for what most
people use their browser homepage for, customizable and safe accessing of news
and other stories, Firefox provides a simple and uncluttered option that’s
free.
In Summary
Open source software, often free,
offers great software alternatives to proprietary software. Often the options
available are more limited than the proprietary software, but sometimes there
are more such as digiKam for photo editing. Microsoft Edge has come up with
some very desirable elements to a customized homepage that can do much more
than most. Straight-forward and customizable homepages are available through
Firefox though. There may be risk in open software because of the possibility
of support disappearing with funding. Open source offers a dynamic option that’s
constantly improving with the crowdsourced code contributions.
Reference
Optimus Information, (2015). Open Source vs.
Proprietary Software Pros and Cons. Retrieved from http://www.optimusinfo.com/downloads/white-paper/open-source-vs-proprietary-software-pros-and-cons.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment